And what to use instead
Most location strategy advice is written for large enterprises. The frameworks, the consulting decks, the case studies — all calibrated for a company with 50,000 people, a corporate real estate team, and enough scale to make any city economical eventually.
For a $50M company adding 80 people in year one, the playbook doesn’t translate. The choices that look optimal at Fortune 500 scale are often quietly wrong at scaleup scale.
Three places the mismatch shows up:
What to use instead is less a framework and more a posture. Optimise for speed and clean execution over long-term theoretical efficiency. Choose a location where you’re sized to matter to local stakeholders, not lost in the queue behind larger investors. Treat the first 90 days after the decision as the actual project, not the months of analysis before.
This isn’t a worse approach. It’s a different one. The mid-market has advantages large enterprises don’t — agility, decisiveness, smaller political surface area. Use them.
Nueconomy works specifically with scaleups and mid-market firms, applying assessment and government facilitation calibrated to that scale — not borrowed down from playbooks built for someone ten times your size.